<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (X)HTML and ARIA validation &#8211; practical results vs. purity win?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-25157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=1883#comment-25157</guid>
		<description>thanks for the post and for the really good comments. my favorite is the firefox validation tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the post and for the really good comments. my favorite is the firefox validation tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gorazd Svajger</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-24970</link>
		<dc:creator>Gorazd Svajger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=1883#comment-24970</guid>
		<description>ARIA Best Practices suggest adding ARIA-related attributes via scripting. That way the document validates and has the necessary attributes.
Plus it&#039;s unobtrusive. No sense in having those attributes if scripting is disabled anyway.

Having said that, I have no experience with any screen reader, so I can only speak theoretically. Keep that in mind while firing up the flamethrower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARIA Best Practices suggest adding ARIA-related attributes via scripting. That way the document validates and has the necessary attributes.<br />
Plus it&#8217;s unobtrusive. No sense in having those attributes if scripting is disabled anyway.</p>
<p>Having said that, I have no experience with any screen reader, so I can only speak theoretically. Keep that in mind while firing up the flamethrower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 未来链</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-24643</link>
		<dc:creator>未来链</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=1883#comment-24643</guid>
		<description>[未来链]自助友情链接系统,智能化的免费友情链接交换,友情链接联盟,友情链接网,友情,链接,中国最大_最早最专业的友情链接网站</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[未来链]自助友情链接系统,智能化的免费友情链接交换,友情链接联盟,友情链接网,友情,链接,中国最大_最早最专业的友情链接网站</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GiO</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-24614</link>
		<dc:creator>GiO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=1883#comment-24614</guid>
		<description>Well from my point of view, validation can be a true pain..Especially if you&#039;re a new coder in the neighbourhood. I say accessibility always overpowers..as long as what they see is flawless why bother with validity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well from my point of view, validation can be a true pain..Especially if you&#8217;re a new coder in the neighbourhood. I say accessibility always overpowers..as long as what they see is flawless why bother with validity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: six03 - Validation or Accessibility?</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/aria-and-validation/comment-page-1/#comment-19654</link>
		<dc:creator>six03 - Validation or Accessibility?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=1883#comment-19654</guid>
		<description>[...] A nice write-up over at Henny&#8217;s site got me to thinking. Accessibility or validity of web pages? I usually have tried to mix in both. Sometimes, vlaidity is thrown out the window for accessibility. Then there are those times when accessibility is key, then something is thrown in, in an after-thought or something so small is over-looked that makes the accessibility not-so-perfect. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A nice write-up over at Henny&#8217;s site got me to thinking. Accessibility or validity of web pages? I usually have tried to mix in both. Sometimes, vlaidity is thrown out the window for accessibility. Then there are those times when accessibility is key, then something is thrown in, in an after-thought or something so small is over-looked that makes the accessibility not-so-perfect. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
