<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t go spoiling the party: Google Chrome to support ActiveX in Korea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:38:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-35007</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 07:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=532#comment-35007</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been living in Seoul for over three years now, and it&#039;s amazing how strong the grip of IE is Koreans. People here are one of the most wired and high-speed subscribers, but they too often pride themselves without really knowing the standards of the rest of the world. The fact that Korea&#039;s economy and market shares in technological goods are rapidly increasing (Samsung, LG, Hynix, etc.) doesn&#039;t help Koreans to see the full picture. Netizens here have to have IE for everything including online banking, checking university bulletins/forums, getting tech support, making online reservations, posting comments on government websites, and lots more. Experts outside of Korea have attributed much of this scenario (in an unofficial capacity) to a combination of nationalism, opting for the status quo, and even Korea&#039;s tradition of somewhat blindly developing technologies developed by others. Much of this trend can be witnessed in other software and IT issues as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been living in Seoul for over three years now, and it&#8217;s amazing how strong the grip of IE is Koreans. People here are one of the most wired and high-speed subscribers, but they too often pride themselves without really knowing the standards of the rest of the world. The fact that Korea&#8217;s economy and market shares in technological goods are rapidly increasing (Samsung, LG, Hynix, etc.) doesn&#8217;t help Koreans to see the full picture. Netizens here have to have IE for everything including online banking, checking university bulletins/forums, getting tech support, making online reservations, posting comments on government websites, and lots more. Experts outside of Korea have attributed much of this scenario (in an unofficial capacity) to a combination of nationalism, opting for the status quo, and even Korea&#8217;s tradition of somewhat blindly developing technologies developed by others. Much of this trend can be witnessed in other software and IT issues as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henny</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Henny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=532#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>Michael, thanks for your comments, very interesting...I didn&#039;t know that Active-X was so embedded in MS sites although this doesn&#039;t come as a surprise.

I understand where you are coming from about about Google going head on with IE. The fact that Chrome was released in Windows first rather than for Mac, Google&#039;s traditional ally, and now is talking about using Active X in Korea is pretty indisputable in that regard. 

Going on what you&#039;ve written it all seems a bit like MS is doing what it can to secure it&#039;s position in the rise of  competition from Firefox, Opera, Safari and now Chrome. Personally I think more browsers out there for the user and more choice will hopefully mean that IE will be diluted somewhat however the grip IE has on business and also in Asia is a pretty big one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, thanks for your comments, very interesting&#8230;I didn&#8217;t know that Active-X was so embedded in MS sites although this doesn&#8217;t come as a surprise.</p>
<p>I understand where you are coming from about about Google going head on with IE. The fact that Chrome was released in Windows first rather than for Mac, Google&#8217;s traditional ally, and now is talking about using Active X in Korea is pretty indisputable in that regard. </p>
<p>Going on what you&#8217;ve written it all seems a bit like MS is doing what it can to secure it&#8217;s position in the rise of  competition from Firefox, Opera, Safari and now Chrome. Personally I think more browsers out there for the user and more choice will hopefully mean that IE will be diluted somewhat however the grip IE has on business and also in Asia is a pretty big one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=532#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>It seems Google and IE might be the next leaders in this ongoing browser War. IE only because most business users are forced to use it by network policies and it comes installed with Windows, so it gets used by people who know nothing about internet security. 

One thing that annoys me is that Microsoft have Active-X embedded in their important information sites, like MSDN 
subscription sites, so you&#039;re forced to use IE to navigate these sites, Microsoft also refuse to make their downloads cross browser compatible because they say that all their users are IE users. Well no *** Microsoft. 

Even MS tech forums that use Ajax, seem to be developed for IE only, do if you&#039;re a Microsoft developer, it gets really annoying having to switch back from using better Browsers to using IE to access certain sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Google and IE might be the next leaders in this ongoing browser War. IE only because most business users are forced to use it by network policies and it comes installed with Windows, so it gets used by people who know nothing about internet security. </p>
<p>One thing that annoys me is that Microsoft have Active-X embedded in their important information sites, like MSDN<br />
subscription sites, so you&#8217;re forced to use IE to navigate these sites, Microsoft also refuse to make their downloads cross browser compatible because they say that all their users are IE users. Well no *** Microsoft. </p>
<p>Even MS tech forums that use Ajax, seem to be developed for IE only, do if you&#8217;re a Microsoft developer, it gets really annoying having to switch back from using better Browsers to using IE to access certain sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iheni</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>iheni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=532#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>Nicely done Bruce - you’re post is linked up top already, very useful stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done Bruce &#8211; you’re post is linked up top already, very useful stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.iheni.com/dont-go-spoiling-the-party-google-chrome-to-support-activex-in-korea/comment-page-1/#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iheni.com/?p=532#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>See http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2008/ie-6-mobile-standards-compliance-tests/ for tests of IE 6 mobile&#039;s standards support</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See <a href="http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2008/ie-6-mobile-standards-compliance-tests/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2008/ie-6-mobile-standards-compliance-tests/</a> for tests of IE 6 mobile&#8217;s standards support</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

